Robert Spangler on 31 Aug 2012 12:51:21 -0700 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PLUG] September Meeting |
On Friday 31 August 2012 15:33, the following was written: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Robert Spangler > > <mlists@zoominternet.net> wrote: > > On Friday 31 August 2012 14:43, the following was written: > >> All in for a key-signing party. Two forms of photo ID and keys printed > >> on paper. Let's do it. > > > > Don't forget your fingerprint cards and urine sample too. > > Can't be to safe anymore. :) > > Sorry if that was a joke (it seems to be, but my sarcasm detector took > an early vacation), but anyway this is pretty standard for a > keysigning party. In fact, it seems to be the method PLUG has used for > some time (going by the mailing list archives). Without carefully > verifying what you're signing, the whole web of trust sort of breaks > down, so the standard seems to be two forms of photo ID, at least in > my experience. Yeah, it was. I know what you are saying and agree with it all. It was more meant for the new guy, trying to make him think, 'what the ....'. :) -- Regards Robert Linux The adventure of a lifetime. Linux User #296285 Get Counted http://linuxcounter.net/ ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug