Doug Stewart on 27 Jan 2013 09:50:05 -0800 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PLUG] dual networking question |
Side note: I would avoid 192.268.100.x for any of your subnets. Cable modems use 192.168.100.1 as a customer management interface. If you ever need to look at statistics, you'll need to be able to reach it.
--Matt
On Jan 27, 2013 11:30 AM, "Ron Kaye Jr" <rekaye1005@verizon.net> wrote:
how about just restricting access to staff resources (hard drive, printer)
through use of permissions.
i always try simple first.
i cant imagine any info being so highly critical.
and if something happens, turn the other cheek
(sorry, just couldnt help myself)
Ron Kaye Jr
914-7294734
On 01/27/13, Eric at Lucii.org wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I'm meeting Monday morning with an IT consultant to discuss setting up dual wireless networks in our church. One will be staff only and will have access to the network resources (printer, shared drives, etc. as well as the Internet.) The other will be public access and only have access to the Internet. The consultant has said that we'll need a second connection to the Internet (currently we have Comcast.)
I think he's wrong. I think we can have two separate networks with different ip address ranges and the server (Windows Server 2008) will only allow one of those ranges to have access to the network resources. Everybody would have access to the Internet. My idea is that the staff network would be 192.168.1.x and the public network would be 192.168.100.x. The staff wireless network would be the same ip range as the Ethernet network in the office.
Am I right? Can this be done this way? Maybe we'll need two routers connected to the Comcast modem or configure the existing router (Linksys IIRC) to handle two network ip ranges?
Thanks,
Eric
- --
# Eric Lucas
#
# "Oh, I have slipped the surly bond of earth
# And danced the skies on laughter-silvered wings...
# -- John Gillespie Magee Jr
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlEFTKMACgkQ2sGpvXQrZ/6DkgCgpK8bpuuP53pFstpzResDoriR
ekwAn3srg/KiTRD6McOzJsueAXdHWxOb
=QHag
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug