Rich Freeman on 21 May 2013 03:15:51 -0700 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PLUG] 2013-05-21 PLUG W follow-up |
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 5:03 AM, JP Vossen <jp@jpsdomain.org> wrote: > But > creating a local repo isn't that hard [3], and with a bit of scripting it > should be possible to create the typical upstream --> staging --> production > flow you'd expect. What might be really interesting is combining the two so > you only mirror the sub-set of the repo that you need (like the proxy idea), > but with the ability to stage updates. Most who run Gentoo in production settings use a similar approach. The Gentoo repository is just a directory tree, with a cat/pkg format (and a few special directories for cache and global resources). Production users would most likely also create a binary package repository so that package upgrades are nearly instant. Obviously production use of Gentoo is much less common than Debian/RHEL, but some swear by it (maybe I'd sum it up as it makes the easy stuff somewhat harder, but the incredibly difficult stuff much easier). Rich ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug