Rich Mingin (PLUG) on 2 Sep 2017 17:11:04 -0700 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PLUG] slow gigbit FiOS |
Hi Brent,thanks for responding.this is the FIOSsto@obi:~$ iperf -c localhost -p 1234------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to localhost, TCP port 1234TCP window size: 2.50 MByte (default)------------------------------------------------------------ [ 3] local 127.0.0.1 port 42320 connected with 127.0.0.1 port 1234[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth[ 3] 0.0-10.3 sec 43.5 MBytes 35.4 Mbits/secthis is xfinity:iperf -c localhost -p 1234------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to localhost, TCP port 1234TCP window size: 2.50 MByte (default)------------------------------------------------------------ [ 3] local 127.0.0.1 port 42348 connected with 127.0.0.1 port 1234^C[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth[ 3] 0.0-164.1 sec 13.8 MBytes 703 Kbits/secI had to use localhost because only ssh port is open on the serverfios is clearly faster but unusable with nx. I've used nx before on a 1mbps and it was still usable but for some reason on fios with 35Mbits/sec its almost unusable. I thought it could be something with the default configuration of the verizon's quantum router that causing the problem.I'm not getting close to your speed probably because of the cable is not cat5e or above. I ordered cat6 cables from amazon to see if it will fix the speed. however, the high latency experienced with nx probably wouldn't go awaysto@jedi:~$ ethtool enp3s0Settings for enp3s0:Supported ports: [ TP MII ]Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full1000baseT/Half 1000baseT/FullSupported pause frame use: Symmetric Receive-onlySupports auto-negotiation: YesAdvertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full1000baseT/Half 1000baseT/FullAdvertised pause frame use: Symmetric Receive-onlyAdvertised auto-negotiation: YesLink partner advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full100baseT/Half 100baseT/FullLink partner advertised pause frame use: Symmetric Receive-onlyLink partner advertised auto-negotiation: YesSpeed: 100Mb/sDuplex: FullPort: MIIPHYAD: 1Transceiver: internalAuto-negotiation: onCannot get wake-on-lan settings: Operation not permittedCurrent message level: 0x000000ff (255)drv probe link timer ifdown ifup rx_err tx_errLink detected: yesOn Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 2:29 AM Sonny To <son.c.to@gmail.com> wrote:thanks for responding. here are the pingsPING shiva.fpmsoft.co (71.59.73.92) 56(84) bytes of data.64 bytes from c-71-59-73-92.hsd1.nj.comcast.net (71.59.73.92): icmp_seq=1 ttl=243 time=151 ms64 bytes from c-71-59-73-92.hsd1.nj.comcast.net (71.59.73.92): icmp_seq=2 ttl=243 time=147 ms64 bytes from c-71-59-73-92.hsd1.nj.comcast.net (71.59.73.92): icmp_seq=3 ttl=243 time=148 ms64 bytes from c-71-59-73-92.hsd1.nj.comcast.net (71.59.73.92): icmp_seq=4 ttl=243 time=152 ms64 bytes from c-71-59-73-92.hsd1.nj.comcast.net (71.59.73.92): icmp_seq=5 ttl=243 time=149 ms64 bytes from c-71-59-73-92.hsd1.nj.comcast.net (71.59.73.92): icmp_seq=6 ttl=243 time=148 ms64 bytes from c-71-59-73-92.hsd1.nj.comcast.net (71.59.73.92): icmp_seq=7 ttl=243 time=149 ms64 bytes from c-71-59-73-92.hsd1.nj.comcast.net (71.59.73.92): icmp_seq=8 ttl=243 time=148 ms64 bytes from c-71-59-73-92.hsd1.nj.comcast.net (71.59.73.92): icmp_seq=9 ttl=243 time=147 ms^C--- shiva.fpmsoft.co ping statistics ---9 packets transmitted, 9 received, 0% packet loss, time 7997msrtt min/avg/max/mdev = 147.352/149.176/152.135/1.532 msPING jedi.fpmsoft.co (100.11.74.5) 56(84) bytes of data.64 bytes from pool-100-11-74-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net (100.11.74.5): icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=137 ms64 bytes from pool-100-11-74-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net (100.11.74.5): icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=137 ms64 bytes from pool-100-11-74-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net (100.11.74.5): icmp_seq=3 ttl=53 time=137 ms64 bytes from pool-100-11-74-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net (100.11.74.5): icmp_seq=4 ttl=53 time=137 ms64 bytes from pool-100-11-74-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net (100.11.74.5): icmp_seq=5 ttl=53 time=138 ms64 bytes from pool-100-11-74-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net (100.11.74.5): icmp_seq=6 ttl=53 time=137 ms64 bytes from pool-100-11-74-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net (100.11.74.5): icmp_seq=7 ttl=53 time=138 ms64 bytes from pool-100-11-74-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net (100.11.74.5): icmp_seq=8 ttl=53 time=137 ms64 bytes from pool-100-11-74-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net (100.11.74.5): icmp_seq=9 ttl=53 time=137 ms64 bytes from pool-100-11-74-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net (100.11.74.5): icmp_seq=10 ttl=53 time=137 ms64 bytes from pool-100-11-74-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net (100.11.74.5): icmp_seq=11 ttl=53 time=137 ms64 bytes from pool-100-11-74-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net (100.11.74.5): icmp_seq=12 ttl=53 time=138 ms64 bytes from pool-100-11-74-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net (100.11.74.5): icmp_seq=13 ttl=53 time=139 ms64 bytes from pool-100-11-74-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net (100.11.74.5): icmp_seq=14 ttl=53 time=142 ms^C--- jedi.fpmsoft.co ping statistics ---14 packets transmitted, 14 received, 0% packet loss, time 12994msrtt min/avg/max/mdev = 137.032/138.137/142.720/1.489 msOn Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 2:17 AM Lee H. Marzke <lee@marzke.net> wrote:You didn't mention the actual latency your getting. The throughput of local servers likely doesn't matter as muchwith large RTT latencies and tcp windowing issues.LeeFrom: "Sonny To" <son.c.to@gmail.com>
To: "Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List" <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 2, 2017 6:33:41 PM
Subject: [PLUG] slow gigbit FiOSI have two servers one on xfinity 150mbps/10mbps in princeton,nj and the other on fios 1gbps/1gbps in Philly. when I did a speedtest on fios, i'm only getting 100mbps/100mbps. I am not sure why but suspect it could be that the cable is not cat6. I ordered cat6 cable to see if that fixes it.The unusual thing is the fios connection is laggy when I am using nx via ssh tunneling with compression. the xfinity ,however, is fast and responsive. I couldn't tell that I'm remote. I expect the fios to be more responsive because the upstream is 100mbps but its almost unusable. I'm connecting to both machines from Sofia, Bulgaria. both connection have similar latency reported via ping. can anyone offer an explanation why?
____________________________________________________________ _______________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug ______________________________--"Between subtle shading and the absence of light lies the nuance of iqlusion..." - KryptosLee Marzke, lee@marzke.net http://marzke.net/lee/
IT Consultant, VMware, VCenter, SAN storage, infrastructure, SW CM______________________________ _______________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
____________________________________________________________ _______________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug