Charlie Li on 6 Nov 2017 10:12:53 -0800 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PLUG] small business server virtualization? |
On 06/11/2017 13:11, Charlie Li wrote: > On 06/11/2017 13:08, Greg Helledy wrote: >> Can it make sense to virtualize so that each application has its own OS >> instance, which can be powered on and off, upgraded, etc. independently, >> for a small business? >> > If everything's running on the same hardware architecture, don't even > bother with virtualisation. Too much overhead for not much benefit > compared to, containers. > > Research systemd-nspawn, LXC, FreeBSD jails, Solaris Zones to name a few > to get a sense of what containers are. They are logically the same as > virtualisation in terms of instance separation. > Aaaaand I missed the part about Windows servers. Virtualise those. But nothing else. -- Charlie "still traversing the processing barrier" Li (This email address is for mailing list use only; replace local-part with vishwin for off-list communication)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug