John Kreno on 6 Nov 2017 10:14:41 -0800

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PLUG] small business server virtualization?

Btw, KVM does support a number of windows os'


On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Charlie Li <> wrote:
On 06/11/2017 13:11, Charlie Li wrote:
> On 06/11/2017 13:08, Greg Helledy wrote:
>> Can it make sense to virtualize so that each application has its own OS
>> instance, which can be powered on and off, upgraded, etc. independently,
>> for a small business?
> If everything's running on the same hardware architecture, don't even
> bother with virtualisation. Too much overhead for not much benefit
> compared to, containers.
> Research systemd-nspawn, LXC, FreeBSD jails, Solaris Zones to name a few
> to get a sense of what containers are. They are logically the same as
> virtualisation in terms of instance separation.
Aaaaand I missed the part about Windows servers. Virtualise those. But
nothing else.

Charlie "still traversing the processing barrier" Li

(This email address is for mailing list use only;
replace local-part with vishwin for off-list communication)

Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --
Announcements -
General Discussion  --

John Kreno

"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual."

 Thomas Jefferson
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --
Announcements -
General Discussion  --