JP Vossen on 17 Nov 2018 08:37:59 -0800


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PLUG] Open Source Equivalent of WordPerfect


On 11/17/18 10:33 AM, Casey Bralla wrote:
Does anybody know if there is an open source equivalent to WordPerfect?
All the word processing programs I have tried all seem to emulate MS
Word, which I detest.   I used to be able to make WP sing, but MS Word
is a burden since it tries to outsmart me and anticipate what it thinks
I want to do, instead of letting me do what I really want to do!

I've been using LibreOffice, and it's adequate, but I was hoping for more.

Anybody have any suggestions?

I never liked WP, I used MultiMate, then WordStar, then various versions of MS Word. I liked Word, and used correctly (which almost no one does) it used to be not that bad. Unnecessary feature bloat and the "ribbon" interface have rendered Word unusable, at least for me. As noted, LibreOffice can be adequate, be even it is far overcomplicated. I switched to markup languages and never looked back.

Casey, what are your use cases? Would a wiki work? Mediawiki (powers wikipedia) is great for all kinds of docs & notes, but it's wiki markup is feeling very old and primitive to me these days. There are a great many others, including some local/desktop lines like Zim. (Zim is awesome.)

Writing in Markdown or Asciidoc then rendering into HTML or PDF using one of the tool chains might work. The tool chains can be a PITA to get going, but once you have it working everything is effortless. There are "static" wikis that work like that too, you have a Git commit hook that renders, so a commit or push to the right place just renders & publishes.

Other random musings:
We wrote the first edition of the _Bash Cookbook_ in OpenOffice, and I had to go to some contortions to handle code samples. Then O'Reilly converted that into Word, then converted the Word into DocBook because that's how their workstream was a the time (circa 2007). That was very painful and introduced a lot of errors.

We wrote the second edition in Asciidoc in Git (converted by O'Reilly from the 1st DocBook, circa 2017). That was great.

Every so often I look at the current markup languages and think about Tex/LaTeX and WordStar "dot" commands and macros, and then think about the cyclical nature of tech and IT...

Later,
JP
--  -------------------------------------------------------------------
JP Vossen, CISSP | http://www.jpsdomain.org/ | http://bashcookbook.com/
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug