Rich Freeman via plug on 3 Apr 2020 07:58:00 -0700 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PLUG] Virtual Plug? |
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 8:20 AM Rich Kulawiec via plug <plug@lists.phillylinux.org> wrote: > > And it's unfixable. Everything is fixable. > 2. At this very moment there are a lot of LUGs (and similar > volunteer/dues-free organizations) trying to find a workable solution > to roughly the same problem...and given that a lot of people involved > in those have some extra time on their hands...this seems like a very > opportune moment for someone (or a group of someones) to either work on > an existing project that shows promise or start a new one. Like the one we're already using, which is 100% FOSS? I can't speak to their hosting - as I understand it everything is FOSS and you could host it yourself, but since this stuff is bandwidth-intensive nobody wants to deal with that. It almost makes you think that the only companies who get into this stuff are companies that want to monetize it. I have no idea what the jit.si business model is. Maybe they're still in the free-venture-capital-to-get-noticed stage and there are no strings attached yet. At some point if it takes off I'm sure the code will still be FOSS but if you want the service somebody will want some money or data from you. > kind of filth who run and staff Zoom Ah, yes, dehumanizing criticism. People build something you don't like, therefore they are literally dirt. Look, if you're using a SERVICE that is free, chances are that it is either incidental to provide, or you're being monetized. Video conferencing is NOT incidental to provide - it is high-bandwidth realtime communication. If it includes phone dial-in you also get to pay for access to the phone system. If you want a commercial provider who isn't going to monetize you then there are plenty of companies who will gladly sell you this service and it is ad-free and facebook-free and all that good stuff. And it no doubt comes with a hefty monthly fee. Maybe for an FOSS community one of them might be willing to waive this, but you're still going to be dealing with proprietary clients that probably don't run on linux outside of a browser. Oh, and it probably won't work on lynx either. > I'm busy with other projects and I don't particularly care about video > conferencing so I'm not volunteering. Wow, plenty of time to criticize, not much time to contribute? Clearly the PLUG community is fully embracing the spirit of modern FOSS. :) With FOSS you get the code for free. It is a beautiful thing. The code usually doesn't come with hosting services, dial-in phone numbers, and all that good stuff. If it does it either comes with a ton of strings, or it depends on the whim of some start-up that is going to eventually burn through its money. -- Rich ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug