Rich Freeman via plug on 5 Oct 2022 11:27:54 -0700 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PLUG] Reg: You thought you bought software – all you bought was a lie |
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 8:35 PM JP Vossen via plug <plug@lists.phillylinux.org> wrote: > > https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/04/you_cannot_buy_software/ > One of my pet peeves is that the idea that commercial software is licensed, and not sold, is essentially a lie at least in the traditional form. That actually makes the central premise of this article, which it seems to take forever to get around to spilling, a lie. Suppose you go to a store and buy a box that has software in it, and you open the box, and it has a big label on the disc that says "This software is licensed for your use. This is not a sale." That is a lie. You bought it. You own it. Period. Now, your rights with that 100% legally owned software are certainly limited by copyright law. Just because you own software doesn't mean that you can copy and redistribute it. Now, if you're renting software with a subscription service, that is certainly more like a licensing relationship. Ultimately though words like "sale" and "licensed" are descriptive. If you want to know if you've bought something you look at how the relationship you have with it works. Just because somebody says they didn't sell something to you doesn't make it so. Yes, I'm aware there are countless articles that are commonly accepted about how software is licensed and not sold. I'm not interested in a parade of links to these. They're wrong, and yes, I'm aware I'm talking about numerous people everybody knows and respects. > I bet $WORK has paid for proprietary software licenses for programs to track and manage...wait for it...proprietary software licenses! Circular insanity. No argument there. I'm ripping my hair out at work trying to figure out who is supposed to pay some invoices for a software subscription, with the threat looming that at some point access to the software could be revoked. That would definitely be a case of "licensing," despite costing millions of dollars... :) -- Rich ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug