|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [PLUG] html conformance (3.2)
|
FYI, I'm checking these pages conformance to html standards at
http://validator.w3.org
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Walt Mankowski wrote:
> What's so bad about putting <b> and </b> tags on every line? Define a
> little keyboard macro in emacs and you can do the whole thing in under
> a minute.
It's inefficient. It works to just put one <b></b> pair around the whole
thing, but I have to do one on each & every line, just to conform to the
standard ?
But this appears to be my only option to conform to html 3.2, so it's
probably what I'll do.
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Michael W. Ryan wrote:
> An alternate is to apply the style to the list itself. Just define the
> following style in your <style> element or styleshett:
>
> .boldface {font-weight: bold;}
>
> And then just use it on any element you want to have bold, i.e.:
>
> <ul class="boldface">
> <li>Bleh</li>
> ...
> </ul>
This looks pretty good, but I believe this stuff is not part of html 3.2 ?
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Bill Jonas wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Michael W. Ryan wrote:
>
> > <li>Bleh</li>
>
> Is the closing tag necessary (or required, or suggested) in HTML 3.2 for
> the <li> element? I wasn't aware that it was.
Nope, I don't use it on my stuff that successfully passed the HTML 3.2
conformance test.
__________________________________________________________________
PGP fingerprint = 03 5B 9B A0 16 33 91 2F A5 77 BC EE 43 71 98 D4
darxus@op.net / http://www.op.net/~darxus
There is no fine line between genius and insanity.
______________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://plug.nothinbut.net
Announcements - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|