|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [PLUG] html conformance (3.2)
|
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Bill Jonas wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Michael W. Ryan wrote:
>
> > <li>Bleh</li>
>
> Is the closing tag necessary (or required, or suggested) in HTML 3.2 for
> the <li> element? I wasn't aware that it was.
For 3.2, not it's not required. 4.0, on the other hand, is the current
recommendation from the W3C. I don't believe that it is strictly
required; hoever, with the advent of stylesheets and DHTML, they strongly
recommend that all optional closing tags be used to avoid ambiguities. It
has always been a good idea to use closing tags that are marked optional.
Michael W. Ryan, MCP, MCT | OTAKON 2000
mryan@netaxs.com | Convention of Otaku Generation
http://www.netaxs.com/~mryan/ | http://www.otakon.com/
No, I don't hear voices in my head;
I'm the one that tells the voices in your head what to say.
______________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://plug.nothinbut.net
Announcements - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|