|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: A Philly Lambda Project
|
- From: "Andrew Gwozdziewycz" <apgwoz@gmail.com>
- To: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
- Subject: Re: A Philly Lambda Project
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 10:31:56 -0400
- Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of apgwoz@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=apgwoz@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-sender:x-apparently-to:received:received:received-spf:authentication-results:received:dkim-signature:domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:reply-to:sender:precedence:x-google-loop:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-unsubscribe; bh=tIqkEQKJ50C8kX8ekv12Ts35ttPs16INsA4ZTR170WU=; b=DFBWj0OBWMDGZeBMNV3Aa5Tz5Euw1kjFgh9nOC554UXq5M0wUYe2tSX4WjX9kWCtgYKTWV9hMzblgANj2HgAScySSSeIKCP9sEneVU+3wwxEklNgyk8jxHIAoqEz3gYounvHdRh71MctQtwV0B8KFPL3kIWiqGb1PWBoU3kRY6E=
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=HojIMgrDdttLWgSKVbQLj2xSG1H1aO77bMgw/j76SZM=; b=A4auOQ4sO8M12SajZO+3Tn80DIncpHbWH6OeY560bauvK2slqT8tqxYV8Ii3ewk0b8l/H0dfQeCSyRyINPq/tw2PcuUGp7SQRCkTw2oiel8e1I1xFtrGz9J7zkBAyPQKGubgATbDKjzZ5dqpllrTCMPyAi1V4LQxm4WAB3uVtew=
- Mailing-list: list philly-lambda@googlegroups.com; contact philly-lambda-owner@googlegroups.com
- Reply-to: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
- Sender: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Jonathan Tran <jonnytran@gmail.com> wrote:
My original response was refuting much of what you said, but I really
do not wish to add to the destructive path of internet flame wars.
> We could even write the solutions in multiple languages for
> comparison. Another way of putting it is larger and more practical
> projecteuler.net problems that once you've done, you might actually be
> able to use for something.
This is potentially a great idea. Practical Euler.
> ...Of course, if people really want to build something innovative or
> potentially useful enough for a business, I'd be all for that. I just
> didn't think there was enough interest in that here.
I'm not suggesting we get business involved, just a Free software
project that solves problems for people day to day.
--
Andrew Gwozdziewycz
apgwoz@gmail.com
http://www.apgwoz.com | http://www.photub.com
|
|