|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: You don't understand. I'm not locked up in here with all of you. You're all locked up in here with me."
|
- From: "Joshua Crean" <joshua.crean@gmail.com>
- To: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
- Subject: Re: You don't understand. I'm not locked up in here with all of you. You're all locked up in here with me."
- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 10:26:24 -0400
- Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of joshua.crean@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.152 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=joshua.crean@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-sender:x-apparently-to :received:received:received-spf:authentication-results:received :dkim-signature:domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id :date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:reply-to :sender:precedence:x-google-loop:mailing-list:list-id:list-post :list-help:list-unsubscribe:x-beenthere; bh=UuLbmUrVoRu9sWF5Z0Zmhy3P0Fmmq6LO1syU49rrP5o=; b=oD4eeNcslhpWTEeMIfVfhpGJoDFskbOMVTiE5PfEyRpjWfps/KYxPs4oUloj7bmOdP YMLvVvTvUIFT7JX/aQwv1vwJz+2DKOycPNCpWbwaC5rA5mRmoYRAyLfBwuPCkQSktGyf ngjn6bmwkUCuqfUrpaDSeF5jobbrUvOTcje9A=
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=UQlZHZ2iQIhnVoFsF9djUoulngQ+HxvmworpIpgCg7Y=; b=lHzVMVlQZpk9T+dGwdIH3yaRtNdkV5jvsq+ZZ5SicJk3+EQlpa36799h26h3/xGqtF u1KWhYEcIWmVGA093KpbBArk3wTzHhkbPx9t5BGpIlWpwF9dXX29UWm6GF0LKz5p2qC8 1sGyIQ48ggYyp+oRJqa0RPr6KBCSJZyc48G1A=
- Mailing-list: list philly-lambda@googlegroups.com; contact philly-lambda-owner@googlegroups.com
- Reply-to: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
- Sender: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
I definitely agree with the your sentiment that it would be much more
visible to contribute back to cperl-mode itself (i mean, you can never
have to much fame, fortune, and women right?), but as Kyle pointed
out, we're kind of making alot of assumptions about how someone wants
to write code.
Of course, in the short term, we can just take the first step of
creating a working generic mode and then we could start talking about
how to get traction for it in the perl community.
-Josh
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Andrew Gwozdziewycz <apgwoz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Kyle R. Burton <kyle.burton@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Andrew Gwozdziewycz <apgwoz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Thanks for the discussion.
>
> It's discussions like this that make me think that I work in the wrong place...
>
> --
> Andrew Gwozdziewycz
> apgwoz@gmail.com
> http://www.apgwoz.com | http://www.photub.com
>
|
|