Jonathan Tran on 18 Nov 2008 07:01:10 -0800


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: FringePhilly

  • From: "Jonathan Tran" <jonnytran@gmail.com>
  • To: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
  • Subject: Re: FringePhilly
  • Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:00:58 -0500
  • Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jonnytran@gmail.com designates 74.125.44.30 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jonnytran@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-sender:x-apparently-to :received:received:received-spf:authentication-results:received :dkim-signature:domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id :date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:reply-to :sender:precedence:x-google-loop:mailing-list:list-id:list-post :list-help:list-unsubscribe:x-beenthere-env:x-beenthere; bh=FWcnzmrJoifdZBKR+OjwNQNrw0mcIruTRsYBY/OFwoQ=; b=LzzaA4hoxvRTxPbtIfibGrRbBJUtry0R6Tue4j3ePNLXJL765gU967MSho2ljq77bK GzIttupXptcN+j/tNHsZakfp3hviwJd15GdJ8ip6piwItbOgjSkSmDI+zJtG64H3XD9w lLr3iEc+vSKLJ0Rqra22dNQNoW1/yS/lKcj6c=
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=11gtQU/DwecFOaYP1Y/zZ+Rg/EuoyqLaMuUpyGjXxic=; b=eTjJQw2+i/iZX9tBOOK8YMu34D1U9U0WE+aM/2gFycRz34itVVj7FEUv8sbZte8AYD F4ULs7Vnfl8N3SufCwMLt7XBTs7P3b1sfW3aJ6SfJemTNUP69U8pAB0xzDad3TjNnAfn mkJF+4prHana7n6E7FioFEFiGJ4nN1/j9W3yM=
  • Mailing-list: list philly-lambda@googlegroups.com; contact philly-lambda+owner@googlegroups.com
  • Reply-to: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
  • Sender: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
I think the idea is that PhillyLambda has focused on not just
functional programming, but all sorts of non-mainstream technologies.

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Andrew Gwozdziewycz <apgwoz@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why not just just call us FunctionalPHL, or
> FuncLangPHL? At least with FuncLang you get the symbol abbreviation common
> in the functional language world...