pezman on 7 Dec 2009 18:56:26 -0800 |
Hmm, something about this doesn't sound "gut feel"-ish, but then again, I'm not in the sales and marketing department. On Dec 1, 10:48 am, Michael Greenberg <michael.m.greenb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:57 AM, pezman <mikehoga...@gmail.com> wrote: > > @MG -- I was wondering if there is any material under development that > > goes deeper into TAPL stuff or other PL topics that might be of > > general interest? I'd love to get the gut feel for the more advanced > > topics in TAPL (System F, F-omega etc.) and topics in intensional type > > systems etc. etc. It might be fun to beta-test some stuff like that > > (otoh, we might be unqualified test subjects). > > The POPL tutorial (http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~plclub/popl08-tutorial/) > covers Fsub. (The approach to variables taken in our book is > inadequate for System F and beyond---locally nameless is the way to > go.) > > Developing soundness proofs for more complicated calculi in Coq is > called, by some, "research". Have a look at recent work by Jianzhou > Zhao and Steve Zdancewic (more Penn PL!) for some interesting > examples. > > Cheers, > Michael
|
|