[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PhillyOnRails] "Ruby for microcontrollers" a short list...
|
I agree. That's a fair point.
On 9/4/07, David Bogus <davidbogus@gmail.com> wrote:
One of the advantage I'd see with using the ruby dsl is testability. Others may feel that testing in C is fine but I find that its requires a significant amount of more boiler plate then in languages with introspection or reflection. This boiler plate makes me feel like I
can't do my normal development cycle.
Dave
On 9/4/07, Mark Chadwick <mark.chadwick@gmail.com> wrote: > Another interesting project:
> > http://rad.rubyforge.org/ > > You might want to poke around that code, as it's taking a small Ruby DSL, > and translating it to C/C++ for the controller.
> > That said, I'm not sure of the real value of shoehorning Ruby on a > microcontroller. C isn't exactly the plague. If there was ever a "time and > place" for C code, it seems like it couldn't be too far from this.
> (Should I duck?) > > Anyone else screwing around with Arduino boards? > > > On 9/4/07, GREG NEELEY <greg_w_neely@yahoo.com > wrote:
> > September 3, 2007 > > > > About all I could find with this fellow: > > > > > http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/65582
> > > > He worked in '03 with various microcontrollers in an > > industry > > setting, and used Ruby, as he describes in "high > > level" > > at URL above. He's outlined three straightforward
> > methodologies. > > > > His last was precisely what I had in mind, (C-TRAN > > paradigm, only using Ruby to generate the C) so > > there's "nothing > > new under the sun" (Ecclesiastes) :-)
> > -GreginKC > > _______________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit: > >
http://lists.phillyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > > > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit: >
http://lists.phillyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > >
-- Dave's Definitions: Morning, is after I've slept for more than four hours. Lunch is the second meal of the day no matter the hour of
consumption. A long drive is one longer then you have last slept. Ineffable, if you don't understand I couldn't possibly explain it. _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
http://lists.phillyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
http://lists.phillyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
|
|