David H. Adler on Sun, 5 Mar 2000 01:35:05 -0500 (EST) |
On Sun, Mar 05, 2000 at 12:49:50AM -0500, Walt Mankowski wrote: > Has anyone else had a chance to read the latest pro-Python, anti-Perl > (and everything else) diatribe on the Oreilly web site, "Why I Promote > Python" (http://www.oreilly.com/news/prescod_0300.html)? It's linked from the "Software Carpentry" page, but I hadn't really looked at it until now... > Certainly there are valid arguments to be made on both sides, but the > author seems so incredibly clueless that I think O'Reilly is doing the > entire Python community a disservice by giving this guy such a > high-profile soapbox. Indeed. Not only does he say 'Many other programs are written in a variety of illegible dialects within the family of languages called "Perl".', which is clearly incomprehensible (is that an oxymoron? :-), but he also presents this comment: 'C++ and Perl only make sense if you have a particular programming background. If you did not come from the "Unix tradition", many of their conventions and idioms seem alien.' I should make clear that, before coming to Perl, I had last programmed in college, in the mid-eighties, in Pascal. I could not, for the life of me, tell you what kind of system we used. I've been using macs other than that since they first came out. A "Unix" background I did not have. In fact, had I not discovered Perl, I might very well *still* not have such a background. I wonder if I should suggest he put that in his pipe and smoke it, or if that would be giving it more attention than it deserves... :-/ dha -- David H. Adler - <dha@panix.com> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/ Trust the computer industry to shorten the term "Year 2000" to Y2K. It was this kind of thinking that got us in trouble in the first place. - Adrian Tyvand **Majordomo list services provided by PANIX <URL:http://www.panix.com>** **To Unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe phl" to majordomo@lists.pm.org**
|
|