Walt Mankowski on Sun, 5 Mar 2000 02:02:43 -0500 (EST) |
On Sun, Mar 05, 2000 at 01:34:58AM -0500, David H. Adler wrote: > It's linked from the "Software Carpentry" page, but I hadn't really > looked at it until now... It's linked from the O'Reilly *home* page right now. > Indeed. Not only does he say 'Many other programs are written in a > variety of illegible dialects within the family of languages called > "Perl".', which is clearly incomprehensible (is that an oxymoron? > :-), but he also presents this comment: 'C++ and Perl only make sense > if you have a particular programming background. If you did not come > from the "Unix tradition", many of their conventions and idioms seem > alien.' > > I should make clear that, before coming to Perl, I had last programmed > in college, in the mid-eighties, in Pascal. I could not, for the life > of me, tell you what kind of system we used. I've been using macs > other than that since they first came out. A "Unix" background I did > not have. In fact, had I not discovered Perl, I might very well > *still* not have such a background. It was a Univac 1100. I don't have a clue what OS it was running. All I remember was that it was something slow. :-) > I wonder if I should suggest he put that in his pipe and smoke it, or > if that would be giving it more attention than it deserves... :-/ Sounds like he's prepared... : Obviously there are many smart people out there preparing to send me : an email claiming that the complexity "buys" them something : valuable. I think that the cost is high. Walt **Majordomo list services provided by PANIX <URL:http://www.panix.com>** **To Unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe phl" to majordomo@lists.pm.org**
|
|