Adam Turoff on Fri, 27 Jun 2003 09:09:26 -0400 |
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 11:27:25PM -0400, Hans Dieter Pearcey wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 09:36:23PM -0400, mjd-perl-pm@plover.com wrote: > > People would probably want to edit the code in their private editor, > > and then paste the result into the wiki. In a better world, there > > would be a browser plugin that did this automatically. An alternative > > that requires an only slightly better world would be that you could > > keep the source code on your disk as usual, edit it as usual, and have > > an editor command that would post the changes to the wiki. > > w3m uses $EDITOR on text entry boxes. I was just about to mention that. w3m + wiki + emacs/vi for code development would vaguely approximate the immersive experience found with a big honking IDE, yet be multiuser and collaborative. Or at least it would be a closer approximation than CVS + emacs/vi alone. FWIW, I used to work on a system mostly written in FORTRAN where there was one function/sub definition per file. That part of the model *can* work. Z. - **Majordomo list services provided by PANIX <URL:http://www.panix.com>** **To Unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe phl" to majordomo@lists.pm.org**
|
|