Chuck Peters on Tue, 29 Jun 1999 16:09:25 -0400 (EDT) |
On Mon, 28 Jun 1999 rsuchowi@nimbus.ocis.temple.edu wrote: > I have tried several times unsuccessfully to use the lizard interface to set up a > caldera box. They have some issues with video with x and kde setup as well as > some other nagging "features" like NEEDING win95 or higher set up to run the > setup programs ie, creation of the lizard, or lisa disks, as well as the setup of > partition magic to create a linux partition. IMHO, you can see why Novell started > to loose market share early/mid 90's when you look at the half baked job that > caldera did on the setup program (note that the founders of caldera were at Novell > when it started it's decent). I have setup redhat, debian, slackware and my > latest attempt was caldera. I keep on coming back to the RH distribution because > it seems to be the easiest to set up and maintain. I haven't use Red Hat much recently and I really like Debian's dselect and apt-get programs for keeping the machines updated and maintained. Why do you think RedHat is easier to maintain than Debian? Thanks, Chuck _______________________________________________ Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|