Anneke K. Hackman on Fri, 9 Jul 1999 16:57:48 -0400 (EDT) |
On Fri, 9 Jul 1999, Michael W. Ryan wrote: > Before I respond to this, I want people to make sure they differentiate > "how things are" and "how things should be". It's an important > distinction. <snip> > As for running multiple services on one box, this isn't the MS design > model (this is where my earlier differentiation comes in). The best way > to ensure a happy, healthy SQL Server is to run it on its own system. I > would also expect Site Server to work better running on its own system. no argument there. this is also why, now that we probably have to rebuild most of our servers, we just bought a new server so we could run SQL and site server on seperate boxes. point also being that it seems ridiculous that you have to run apps on seperate boxes, just so they don't mess eachother up. it's not even like running a firewall and monitoring software on different boxes (which would be for security reasons)-- but rather because they /can't/ behave themselves when on the same box. Such is M$. anneke ************************************************************************** Anneke K. Hackman http://www.anneke.net "Real Women Use Linux" anneke@linux.wku.edu ************************************************************************** > Michael W. Ryan, MCP, MCT | OTAKON 1999 > mryan@netaxs.com | Convention of Otaku Generation > http://www.netaxs.com/~mryan/ | http://www.otakon.com/ > PGP fingerprint: 7B E5 75 7F 24 EE 19 35 A5 DF C3 45 27 B5 DB DF > PGP public key available by fingering mryan@unix.netaxs.com (use -l opt) _______________________________________________ Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|