Chris Fearnley on Thu, 22 Jul 1999 15:25:52 -0400 (EDT) |
I don't understand the religious hatred against winmodems. I tend to agree with http://linmodems.org/ that Linux support would be a good thing. Linux is so efficient with CPU that using it to gain flexibility (not to mention being able to support those who own winmodems) seems worth it to me. Modems are so slow that I can't imagine CPU will be a noticeable bottleneck. I also believe that Linus will allow any driver into the kernel that does not adversely affect stability. So once winmodem drivers are sufficiently stable, I expect to find them in the kernel. In my view the big disadvantage with winmodems is that they all have different incompatible chipsets. And many of them are undocumented. These are the reasons that Linux support for them will continue to lag. But the fundamental idea of using the CPU to simplify the hardware sounds like a smart idea to me. It means I don't need a soldering iron to reprogram my modem! On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 02:49:36PM -0400, Jason S. wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jul 1999 Vale_Kenny@vanguard.com wrote: > > > > Here's the question...not that I'd get one, but what is to prevent a modem maker > > from making a Lin-modem? Is it the way in which Linux interracts with the > > serial ports? > > Anything is possible. If they did make them, who would buy one? If > you're running linux you're savy enough to realize that its a bad idea > to do it that way. And I'm pretty sure hell would freeze over before > Linus would allow lin-modem drivers into the kernel source tree. I > guess the only thing stopping them from doing it is a lack of > market. -- Christopher J. Fearnley | Linux/Internet Consulting cjf@netaxs.com | Design Science Revolutionary http://www.CJFearnley.com | Explorer in Universe "Dare to be Naïve" -- Bucky Fuller _______________________________________________ Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|