Michael Leone on Fri, 27 Aug 1999 15:35:57 -0400 (EDT) |
At 02:45 PM 8/27/99 -0400, you wrote: >> I can connect to the internet just fine this way. Can't seem to >> telnet/ftp in from another station on my local LAN, tho, which I also > >That all looks ok except for a little extra stuff but that shouldn't hurt >anything. Can you ping another machine on your 192. network by >IP address? Yes. Can ping 192.168.0.10, another Win95/Linux machine. >Did you try and telnet/ftp by name or IP? By IP. TELNET 192.168.0.1, from another linux box (192.168.0.10). Says a connection is established. Then it says that the connection is closed - before I can even attempt to log in. >when I want to hang up. If you failed to telnet/ftp using names >and it works with IP addresses then your routes are ok and you need to >examine name resolution. No, it fails with IP addresses, so the name resolution shouldn't be an issue in this case. >If not it could be that extra network route. >You may have to delete both and recreate the one. Use the -net >option. > >/sbin/route del 192.x.0.0 >/sbin/route del 192.x.0.0 >/sbin/route add -net 192.x.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0 Thanks, I'll try that tonight. ---------------------------------------------------------------- "...and if you have any questions about anything, come on up and ask me. Even if I don't know the answer, I'll make something up and you'll believe me."-Unknown _______________________________________________ Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|