Michael Leone on Tue, 23 Nov 1999 19:03:26 -0500 (EST) |
> Now as the common belief goes (or at least what I was > taught), screensavers > were invented in order to save your screen from screen burn. Exactly right. > And yet, this > is completely illogical, as while you're working you have the > same images on the screen for possibly hours at a time and that causes no > visible damage even over a relatively long period of time. Nowadays, no. Well, on non-monochrome screens anyway. (You can still see screen burn-in on some monochrome ATM machines - the older ones, anyway) >Now my question is this: > Originally were screens built so that they got burned far > more easily (& why did they/why don't newer ones), Better materials/manufacturing processes/better refresh rates. VGA and above is not really subject to screen burn-in. Older CGA/MGA *are* subject to it. So, no, no technical reasons, nowadays. >and if not, then was the sole purpose of the > screensaver eye candy to get people to buy Windows? No. It was to make the screens "cooler" looking for the non-techie types. _______________________________________________ Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|