Nicolai Rosen on Tue, 23 Nov 1999 18:39:48 -0500 (EST) |
Now as the common belief goes (or at least what I was taught), screensavers were invented in order to save your screen from screen burn. And yet, this is completely illogical, as while you're working you have the same images on the screen for possibly hours at a time and that causes no visible damage even over a relatively long period of time. Now my question is this: Originally were screens built so that they got burned far more easily (& why did they/why don't newer ones), and if not, then was the sole purpose of the screensaver eye candy to get people to buy Windows? I agree. My opinion is that a screensaver is a waste of good CPU cycles.
_______________________________________________ Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|