Ed Sager on Wed, 24 Nov 1999 03:39:40 -0500 (EST) |
In many business environments, people use the same program over and over and over... The app screens never change or move except for field data. When the image's borders and title bars etc. don't move or get covered by another app, you get screen burn. I've seen many a monitor with the "ghost" of a standard screen burned in. ----- Original Message ----- From: Nicolai Rosen <laktar@hotmail.com> To: <plug@lists.nothinbut.net> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 1999 6:39 PM Subject: Re: [Plug] XFree locks up local console > Now as the common belief goes (or at least what I was taught), screensavers > were invented in order to save your screen from screen burn. And yet, this > is completely illogical, as while you're working you have the same images on > the screen for possibly hours at a time and that causes no visible damage > even over a relatively long period of time. Now my question is this: > Originally were screens built so that they got burned far more easily (& why > did they/why don't newer ones), and if not, then was the sole purpose of the > screensaver eye candy to get people to buy Windows? > > >I agree. My opinion is that a screensaver is a waste of good CPU cycles. > >Personally, I just turn the monitor off when I'm not using the computer > >(and > >let the computer run most of the time). Of course, it's my own *personal* > >personal computer, with me being one of only two people that > >(theoretically) > >have physical access to it. Of course, in a different setting, this might > >be unacceptable without some other security measures. > > > >Bill > > ______________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net > http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug > _______________________________________________ Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|