Daniel K. Spicer on Tue, 30 Nov 1999 10:42:23 -0500 (EST) |
Yeah, distribute it. It's a great product. It's not "open source" , but it is mostly freely distributed. And it runs on Linux and Windows. I run Linux at work, at a place with about 200 PC's, 3 of them run Linux. One of the biggest drawbacks to running Linux in this environment, is that the standard for word processing, spreadsheets, scheduling, and the like, is Microsoft stuff. I'll go through extensive efforts to be able to use Linux instead of NT, as I'm sure everyone reading this would. But we are the minority. The path of least effort is the choice for most people. Having an office suite that runs on Windows and Linux, makes the introduction of Linux workstations to a Windows environment a much simpler undertaking. -Dan Casey Liscum wrote: > Hello all, > > I work at UofPenn and we distribute CD's quarterly to everyone affiliated > with the University. My boss sent this: > > > A student suggested that we consider putting the StarOffice Suite (MS > > Office clone) on the PennConnect CD next year. A site license is cheap > > ($1,000 unlimited, I think) so cost is not an issue. > > > > Do any of you have experience with StarOffice, or have you read or > heard > > things that would indicate that this is a good/bad idea? > > Any opinions? > > ------------------------------------------ > Casey Liscum > http://blankspace.org/ > cwl22@drexel.edu > > _______________________________________________ > Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net > http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug _______________________________________________ Plug maillist - Plug@lists.nothinbut.net http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|