Chris Beggy on Wed, 8 Mar 2000 21:36:43 -0500 (EST) |
fourje wrote: > > GOOD :-) > > > >Also - are you using Slack. 7 ? If so - what's it like?? > > > > Well, I think it's all right, but I have no basis for comparison (other > <BIG SNIP> > > Thanks for the input - I started with Slackware 3.0, and have used 4.0 - > just wondering if 7.0 was worth the visit. Slack 7 is good, especially because of glibc2. I think Patrick was conservative about the migration, and was wiser than some other distros. I too was conservative, and did completely fresh installs on backed-up machines that were previously 3.x(libc5) which reduced my chances for nightmares. Then I restored the parts of userland, var, and etc I needed. The kernel is 2.2.x and you get to play with ipchains rather than with ipfwadm for firewalling... ifconfig behaves a little differently, and nfs seems a little more peppy. PCI (VIA chipset), scsi, and ide drives do not play nicely together, but I think this is deeper than a distro problem. glibc2 seems to build bigger binaries than libc5, but hey, that's progress, right? Patrick is also using /opt and including rpm in slack 7, which is also a change, I think. I basically just like Slackware because my first install was with a stack of Slack floppies and Matt Welsh's install guide, which was slack-centric. Chris ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://plug.nothinbut.net Announcements - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|