Michael Leone on Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:34:25 -0400 (EDT) |
> My question is that do I need the two sides of my FW to be two separate > subnets? I.e. if my router is 192.168.1.1, should the external interface > of the FW be 192.168.1.2, with a mask of 255.255.255.252, and the internal > interface be 192.168.1.5, with a mas of... grrr... everything above .4 (I > can never figure those out). Yes. On our LAN, the external interface of the FW is one of our registered node numbers (we have 60 nodes from our ISP, 1/4 of a Class C). Your internal is your private, 192.168.1.2 address. But we do NAT (MASQ'ing, in Linux-speak), tho, which may make it different than just forwarding.. > Also, should the LAN systems then use the FW or the router for their > gateway? FW. If you use the router, you'll be bypassing the FW completely. You want everybody to go thru the firewall, which THEN goes out the router. ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://plug.nothinbut.net Announcements - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|