aab on Mon, 10 Jul 2000 11:37:32 -0400 (EDT) |
I'll agree with PuTTY, although I usually assume that my connections are good and I can download it vs. carry floppies. :^) Have you possibly missed a step with the OpenSSH install? We're looking at it to replace the SSH1&SSH2 installs on some of our hosts, OpenSSH is simpler and cleaner to install and I can't say I've had any problem with the key generation process. Plus, instead of two daemons on the box, it is a single one that handles both protocols. Is it possible that you used TeraTerm before with a different SSH setup, now you're seeing problems with the cached keys not matching the ones it is getting from the OpenSSH install? andrew. On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Flint Heart wrote: > putty. > its a windows ssh client. > very cool and very small. > I carry a floppy of it with me. > > N-Tropy > > On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Michael Whitman wrote: > > > I am trying to get a secure alternative to telnet running on my Rh > > machine. I found out about ssh. I also need to use a NT 4 ssh client. I > > see that www.ssh.com has software that isn't free. I downlaoded and > > installed the OpenSSH 2.1.1 rpm and installed it, and I installed an NT > > client called Tera Term Pro (http://www.zip.com.au/~roca/ttssh.html), but > > teratermpro doesn't recognize the public keys that that the OpenSSH's > > ssh-keygen or ssh-keygen2 produces. > > ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://plug.nothinbut.net Announcements - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.nothinbut.net/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|