Michael Leone on Mon, 9 Apr 2001 11:51:13 -0400 |
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 11:12:40AM -0400, Michael Leone wrote: > > No, because the help for that option (if I'm remembering the option that > > you're referring to correctly) said that unless I'm a developer (which I'm > > not), I shouldn't need to enable that. > > I just looked at it myself. I did a 'make xconfig', disabled > "Experiemental", looked at "Filesystems", and lo and behold, there was > much wailing and gnashing of teeth. Ah HA. Good to know. > I usually enable experimental and then *don't* select things labeled > "Experimental" unless I have some good reason to do so. I've usually done it that way, too. But this time, I figured - "What the hell ... I'll follow the help file recommendations". THAT'LL teach me not to RTFHF (Read the freakin' help files). > > Also, ReiserFS isn't considered "experimental" anymore, is it? I thought > > that's why it's included with the main kernel source nowadays, instead of > > being a separate download patch, like it is with 2.2.19. > > I wouldn't consider it experimental either, having used it for some months > now. Possibly, Linux just isn't 100% confident yet (but see > http://www.reiserfs.org/testm.html), or the kernel developers (since I > imagine they always answer "y" to "Experimental?") just haven't noticed > yet. Thanks. ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|