gabriel rosenkoetter on Tue, 5 Jun 2001 21:30:07 -0400 |
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 08:39:23PM +0000, qumak wrote: > this to me would suggest that du can be only as specific as the block size of > your filesystem (the -b option looks for bits, by the way - much like wc -c, > except of course the 4091 extra non-existant bits ;)) Hrm. Perhaps GNU du. BSD du, as I've said a few times, reports in 512b blocks on a disk with 8192b blocks in the disk label. I'll stress again that this is NOT the on-disk sector size. > I'm assuming the fifth byte is in fact the first, being a magic number, but > i'm probably wrong, it could be something else entirely ;) Nope, it's the newline which (BSD and GNU, but not System V) echo adds without the -n option. ~ g r @ eclipsed.net ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|