gabriel rosenkoetter on Mon, 17 Sep 2001 15:41:08 +0200 |
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 11:54:14PM -0400, ian reinhart geiser wrote: > heh, something tells me that ones priorities in a text editor are quite > different when the /usr partition is borked.... Well, mine aren't. Counting coding (perhaps a little expansive, but you can surely see how it's more similar to this than to word processing), at least 50% of my text editing is system administration. I like vi. I'm much faster in vi than I ever was in BBEdit on my macs, back before they all migrated to Unix-like operating systems. But I'm by no means suggesting that I'm the average. I hope it was pretty clear that I was being facetious. > in the real world we chose an editor for what it can do when we want it to do > what we want it to do. Right, and vi does precisely what I want in my real world. :^> (By the way, when did this become about vi? I was talking about ed!) (I should be careful to point out here that vim does too much for my taste.) > me personally i diplore vi for the single reason you > need to key in a billion inane key combos just to edit a file... and god > knows what state the editor is in when it randomly decides to add the text > you typed 50x.... Fine, so vi's wrong for you, but let's not drop to generalizations here. I would much rather type a couple keystrokes than have to move my hand to the mouse. And when that repetition happens, you typed a numeral before you switched into editing mode without canceling the numeral (with escape) first. Just fyi. :^> > at any rate, we are no longer working on IBM 360s so we > can afford the finer things in life like maby text selection with a mouse? Sure, if you want to waste all that time reaching for it. I sure don't. If I want to delete three words, I type /<first two letters>3dw. Plenty speedy. > granted this is coming from the guy who grew up with MacOS/NeXT and Amiga > Work Bench... Hey, man, I'm with you. The machine I type on now is the first computer not in your list there that I've bought (it's an 800 Mhz Athlon chip on an ATX motherboard in a generic full tower case; it was far cheaper than the PowerMac G4 or Sun Ultra 10 I really coveted). I guess, to be fair, I've never owned an Amiga, but the other two bootable systems in this room (and there's enough spare hardware that there could be maybe two more bootable systems, but whatever) are a PowerMac 6500 (for NetBSD/macppc development) and a NeXT turbocube (with both heads, thanks much) running NeXTStep 3 (right now; I plan to do NetBSD/next68k work on it, but maybe on a separate drive). One of my best friends owns both versions of the Apple Lisa (yes, both boot). I'm a big fan of the GUI. For graphical stuff. Text editing is not, for me, a graphical thing. (Oh, and word processing? Falls into programming for me. I use LaTeX.) Let me reiterate, though, that my last email was a *joke*. There's only so long I can see this KDE/Gnome wanking go past before I have to step out as the crotchety command line (where I use vi editing keys, btw) guy I am. But that doesn't mean I think you should be the same way. :^> -- ~ g r @ eclipsed.net Attachment:
pgpsbRfBxku6c.pgp
|
|