paul on Sat, 13 Oct 2001 20:50:26 +0200 |
> should be easier. If the job is out of their league or not so good: read > MS maintainane for linux person, then the interview probably won't go > well, which is good b/c the job wouldn't be any fun anyway. Actually, a Linux guru should be able to easily adapt to a Micro$oft environment. Would the interviewer recognize that? Doubt it. But, like myself, if I couldn't bring Linux in, I would have to move out eventually! That's partly why I'm seeking a job now. I think the stress comes from that fact that the interviewer is looking for faults. > > do you think you work with others" kind of fluff question. But mostly, it > > was things like "write me a standard C++ class with public, protected, and > > private attributes and methods". Those are the kind of things that the > > candidate is either going to know or not know, regardless of their environment. > > Now this is a good interview. That sounds like a good way to do a technical assessment. I'm more of a tech/admin type, but I do some recreational programming. Whenever I need some JavaScript, I usually find a script and just modify it a bit. Sometimes I do the same with PHP. My point is that I might not be able to write something from scratch without a reference of some kind, but I can get a script to do what I want usually. That explains why I don't apply for programming jobs! That and the fact that I don't have a BSCS. ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|