Leonard Rosenthol on Fri, 4 Jan 2002 09:17:51 -0500 |
You'd have a hard time running Mac OS X on non-Apple hardware,
but only because they've purposely coded such limitations into the OS. No, it's because they (have yet?) to want to try! Since Apple makes money on hardware, why would they want to lose that revenue if their software (which sells their hardware) ran elsewhere? However, I suspect that Mac OS X COULD be compiled and run on any platform with Darwin as the kernel and gcc available for compilation. You can run Darwin on anything for which it's got hardware support. Right - which includes Intel boxes! If you just want the kernel part of Mac OS X, you can install that on a Intel box along with standard XWindows, etc. and go merrily computing along. I made, and intend to make, no defense of Mac OS X as either Free or open source software.
Darwin, I'll defend as being open and modifiable. I really don't care about the political issues, so I don't know what Apple's stance on redistribution is this week. Darwin is fully open source, using all the standard meanings of that word. It's not GPL, but the license is still quite reasonable.
|
|