JP Toto on Thu, 24 Jan 2002 10:10:42 -0500 |
That's interesting. I DO have xfs running. Perhaps I will try 86ing that and see what resources if frees up... --- gabriel rosenkoetter <gr@eclipsed.net> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 07:40:41AM -0500, christophe > barbé wrote: > > I can't see real 'pro' to use a X Font Server. But > I can see a few cons > > (per exemple ressource wasting). > > The X font server (not to be confused with Irix's > xfs nor Berkeley's > xFS, a network file system with distributed backing > store) makes > sense if you've got a bunch of (mostly dumb) X > terminals talking > to the same X server. > > I agree with Christophe: it's worse than useless in > a single-machine > set up. (It's far worse than a resource waste; it's > a security > liability.) > > -- > gabriel rosenkoetter > gr@eclipsed.net > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature ===== JP Toto ViceClown@yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! http://auctions.yahoo.com ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|