gabriel rosenkoetter on Thu, 24 Jan 2002 10:13:44 -0500 |
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 08:18:53AM -0500, Anthony Locascio wrote: > ummm, so it seems from what you are saying (if I am reading it > correctly) that the connection via DCHP will work without any additional > configuration on my part. Provided I change the settings that the tech > guy said. (Gateway, DNS, IP, Hostname, Netmask, etc) And then proceed > to use the DCHP settings that are in the machine. Get IP address via > DCHP or something. Is that correct? Or am I getting something confused? You needn't (and shouldn't) set any of that if their DHCP server setup is even remotely clued. *All* of your network information comes from the DHCP (well, BOOTP, actually) response. Your machine need know nothing more than that it's connected to an ethernet segment. It'll do a broadcast (to the global broadcast address, 0xffffffff), which will yield a reply from the DHCP server. (Don't worry about broadcasting globally... you're doing it anyway if you run a DHCP client and the router for your network would be completely broken if it relayed that packet.) > Whats wrong with Linuxconf? :P Suits my converted NON PROGRAMMING ass > just fine! Thanks you!! Except that it has a history of doing things wrong and having a horrendous interface. That may have changed, the last time I put up with its wrong-headedness was trying to patch up a RH 6.2 system that had been compromised, when it completely botched a variety of changes in /etc. It does not take a programmer to use a command line. -- gabriel rosenkoetter gr@eclipsed.net Attachment:
pgp5uoeanSzpT.pgp
|
|