Bill Jonas on Sun, 14 Apr 2002 08:50:11 +0200 |
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 11:40:34PM -0400, gabriel rosenkoetter wrote: > I haven't taken the time to track it down, but since it seems to be > reproducible, maybe we should make something of a group effort and > at least send a bug report if not a patch. Trust calculation. I noticed that a key I've signed takes much longer to validate than that of someone whose I haven't signed. Assuming you're using mutt, you can verify for yourself by hitting ^C after a couple seconds (after it should've had enough time to validate the signature itself). Instead of getting something like the following (with or without the warning): gpg: Signature made Sat Apr 13 23:40:34 2002 EDT using DSA key ID 0CF9091A gpg: Good signature from "gabriel rosenkoetter <gr@eclipsed.net>" gpg: aka "gabriel rosenkoetter <rosenkoetter@pobox.com>" gpg: aka "gabriel rosenkoetter <gr@cs.swarthmore.edu>" gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. gpg: Fingerprint: 1175 C547 F847 8340 AC62 6C20 F5E8 5A70 0CF9 091A It'll look like: gpg: Signature made Sat Apr 13 23:40:34 2002 EDT using DSA key ID 0CF9091A gpg: Good signature from "gabriel rosenkoetter <gr@eclipsed.net>" gpg: aka "gabriel rosenkoetter <rosenkoetter@pobox.com>" gpg: aka "gabriel rosenkoetter <gr@cs.swarthmore.edu>" gpg: some signal caught ... exiting The effect is especially pronounced on a slower machine (like my dual-CPU SPARC 10). One solution is to use the always-trust option. Just put "always-trust" in your ~/.gnupg/options, and validations will only take a couple of seconds (or less if you have a faster machine). The problem with this approach, besides losing trust-checking, is that now the output looks like this: gpg: Signature made Sat Apr 13 23:40:34 2002 EDT using DSA key ID 0CF9091A gpg: Good signature from "gabriel rosenkoetter <gr@eclipsed.net>" gpg: aka "gabriel rosenkoetter <rosenkoetter@pobox.com>" gpg: aka "gabriel rosenkoetter <gr@cs.swarthmore.edu>" gpg: WARNING: Using untrusted key! As for what's going into the next version, I don't follow GnuPG development, but the man page for version 1.0.6 has this nugget: --no-expensive-trust-checks Experimental use only. -- Bill Jonas * bill@billjonas.com * http://www.billjonas.com/ Developer/SysAdmin for hire! See http://www.billjonas.com/resume.html Attachment:
pgp0ye9b2sDIq.pgp
|
|