ian reinhart geiser on Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:49:42 -0400 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 AFIK mutt is the only mailer that attaches the gpg sig as an attachment. KMail also wraps the entire message in the GPG signature. I think this came up before and it was decided that mutt was using an older implementation while KMail and Pine where using the new standard. I forget the details on it though. Knowing what security freaks the KMail guys are I find it hard to belive that KMail is using an insecure method. - -ian reinhart geiser On Wednesday 24 April 2002 02:42 pm, Time wrote: > I apologize for beating this dead horse... > > I just found out PINE isn't standards compliant to GnuPG useage. If we > have gone over this before I either didn't understand it or wasn't > paying attention, but I definitely missed the buss. > > Well, seems even though I have GnuPG setup to run in the PINE MUA > ( http://www.clockbot.net/pub/tools/GnuPG ) I can't verify messages sent > to me and signed/encrypted from a MUTT/GnuPG MUA. > > Why? Because MUTT attaches the signature instead of putting it into the > message body while PINE puts the sig stuff into the body. > > o_O So, PINE, being the easiest for my users to use cannot bring their > security up to par unless they learn MUTT... or do a manual verification > of the attached sig stuff... > > O_o This is where I ask if anyone has found a work around for this. > > > > Regards, > > Time > > > > 13 > > \ > 9 . 3 clockbot.net > / > > 6 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8xv4SPy62TRm8dvgRAgzjAJ0Z7hCmHJ1uBCvZXTuu/9htkTFCegCg7R87 Z8JIGLbK/077SYsraeXLkPU= =PAgk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|