| gabriel rosenkoetter on Wed, 24 Apr 2002 15:12:20 -0400 |
|
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 02:59:35PM -0400, kevin mudrick wrote: > I'm running into the same trouble.. Apologies if my sig-within-the-message > is annoying to everyone. Well, it means that mutt doesn't automatically verify it for me, but I don't much mind. |gpg --verify is quite easy. (Incidentally, saving each of the attachments to my PGP/MIME messages and then doing a gpg --verify <sig file> <msg file> would work just fine for you.) > I've been using pine for 6 years, so as lame as it might sound, > I'm running into some trouble adapting to mutt. Out there in the ether somewhere is a sample .muttrc that sets all the keybindings to match pine's. You might try that. (Use google.) > I use the program pgpenvelope to handle all of my gpg integration. I'm > not sure if its pine itself that's the problem.. I think I'll email the > author to see what he thinks. Yep, it's pine. Because, despite people wanting it for years, U Washington refuses to include proper multipart MIME support in their MUA. See: http://www.washington.edu/pine/faq/attachments.html#top Oh, and "the author" is kind of a laughable concept with pine. -- gabriel rosenkoetter gr@eclipsed.net Attachment:
pgpELLDwjjNww.pgp
|
|