adam on Fri, 26 Apr 2002 17:30:27 -0400 |
My boss just got me a sparc from "anysystem.com" to serve as a test box. http://www.anysystem.com/sunul1170170.html "Ugly Duckling Ultra 1 170E" - $195.00 is the one we got. I've installed solaris 8 on it, as well as iplanet slapd, and it's no speed demon, but it's no slug either. /a On Apr 26 Noah silva wrote: > Aside from that, I like Sun the company, and I like Sun equipment. BUT > notice I still own a PC for desktop use. I will promote sun equipment for > server use every day of the week, but some of their cheaper desktop stuff > is just chinsy, and the reason people buy Sun stuff and pay the price > premium is usually for reliability. > > -- noah silva > > On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Tobias DiPasquale wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > > > On Friday 26 April 2002 05:23, Naresh Reddy wrote: > > > Sounds good. I like the Blade 100 for $995. And the Netra X1 for $995 is > > > great too. Are there any Sun dealers around the Philly area? BTW I think > > > Sun is taking off Solaris on Intel(32) is because they are comming out > > > with a linux dist (which is stupid of them). > > > > > > Thanks > > > Naresh > > > > > > > You should be aware of this, however. I had an Ultra 5 as a webserver and then > > bought a Blade 100 for this purpose and have regretted the decision the whole > > time. The Blade 100 is a slower machine overall, due to the cheap components > > they use (IDE HDD, PC133 RAM, etc.) Even though the Ultra 5 was 133MHz > > slower, CPU-wise, it still smoked the Blade when it came to server HTTP and > > FTP. So if that's what you want it for, don't buy a Blade 100; look for a > > cheap Ultra 5/10 on eBay or somewhere else. > > > > - -- > > - ------------------------------------------------------ > > << Tobias DiPasquale >> > > UNIX Software Engineer [Linux/BSD/UNIX/C/Java/Ruby] > > mailto:anany@ece.villanova.edu | web:http://cbcg.net/ > > - ------------------------------------------------------ > > Software engineers are not traditional engineers; > > they're rock stars. > > -- Greg Copeland, CTO of Cenzic > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > > > iQEXAwUBPMmvttoc4r8dJvA2FAPs4AQAl/1hTpUz3v0dp1FTRXOGuvIGWeVW8zn4 > > dJVFClXYvEeQwtxHkLFUH3/ApyFEO3lVpVNCb2l3tdhmO0N+P5UqHZS6msq/aKel > > yLtEXeKkQ5ax4sNnMNC/3zVLPF+6UaF7lSC4Py0nNfAHIYMSi/UZ4VKd3pp2DHRX > > OpC7KMUoDmMD/2Um7QSqHebRmVOfSVhKB6oGtRQeAQJk632LPkGifq5eJQdXO+WD > > d9I7HrGhO1377EEBuT3BaQldpSH/wQ4HpunxXoBUXKJGSaasWQeIxLgAkLgnVFEg > > ILig3heP6jJSud01qIf8AKIZwdRet3TNF219Hgj4dthpmM3yKrfTyPm9 > > =dDHR > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org > > Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce > > General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org > Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce > General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug > > -- /// www.boomshanka.org /// (Do you really want to quit now?) NOTE: While signatures are arguably a blemish, they are a well-understood convention, and conveying the same information in headers exposes it to mangling and makes it rather less conspicuous.... ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|