Michael Leone on Mon, 13 May 2002 09:52:27 -0400 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 13 May 2002 at 9:08, gabriel rosenkoetter wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 08:55:54AM -0400, Michael Leone wrote: > > auth.log has nothing, nor does syslog. I can't find any other log > > that says anything. I would have thought auth.log would, since it is > > trying to log in, but it's empty of any messages from cvs. > > Depends on what you've got syslog sending there. > > It might be worth checking the pserver code to see where it stores > login info, though. Not by me; I'm not a programmer. :-) I might be able to puzzle it out, eventually - by which time, he'll have some other option in place. since he does have a need for CVS. > Also, you'd do better to actually use a local-to-pserver password > file, since the passwords to login to it get stored in clear text on > the client side. (It's possible logging in via system passwords was > purposely broken at some point and the documentation hasn't caught > up.) > > > It did, but then I removed it, so now there is none. But the > > repository should still exist, and yet it still says that it doesn't > > (after removing .cvspass). > > You did issue a cvs -d :pserver:localhost:/usr/local/cvs login after > removing the old .cvspass, right? Yes. Still said no repository. mjl@slimtop:/var/log$ more /home/mjl/.cvspass /home/mjl/.cvspass: No such file or directory mjl@slimtop:/var/log$ cvs -d :pserver:mjl@localhost:/usr/local/cvs login Logging in to :pserver:mjl@localhost:2401/usr/local/cvs CVS password: /usr/local/cvs: no such repository > cvs login makes no sense with the rsh login method. Just do your > cvs import/checkout/update/whatever. Ah. > > The vast majority of the time, it will only be transferred from one > > station on the LAN to another. Not from remote (i.e., out of the > > office) locations, altho that might happen occasionally. > > And you trust that network? Really? Any 802.11B on it? You sure? He trusts it, apparently. :-) And I think there is 802.11b on it, yes. As I said, not my decision to make, since it's not my LAN, altho I will recommend it. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 7.0.4 -- QDPGP 2.68 Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html iQA/AwUBPN/FD5q0HvZapbzfEQLE/QCfdtwUppY8OphgZSsPQfs2PRZtEgkAoK8b JUzyTDqnmp88cX1ToZP3OfPA =NIZg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|