christophe barbé on Fri, 14 Jun 2002 14:31:53 -0400 |
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 01:36:08PM -0400, gabriel rosenkoetter wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 01:27:28PM -0400, christophe barbé wrote: > > Why ? RedHat, debian, Mandrake and the new LimitedLinux (oops sorry > > UnitedLinux) support the FHS (at least at some extends). > > There are way more distributions of Linux than that. Hey, look, I'll > go grab the Debian cvs tree, remove the -e flag from echo(1), make > it use NetBSD's rc structure instead of SysV rc at all, and call it > gr GNU/Linux. > > What's FHS stand for anyhow? It is made especially for you. With it you can grab the last debian source "remove the -e flag from echo(1)" and NOT "make it use NetBSD's rc structure" and then expect most programs run smoothly on your GabeLinux. > (A Linux-specific standard? Why not just follow POSIX or SuS like > the rest of us?) I am not aware enough of these standards to comment but after using SuSe, RedHat and now debian, I am very happy to see distributions following a Linux specific standard. Christophe > -- > gabriel rosenkoetter > gr@eclipsed.net -- Christophe Barbé <christophe.barbe@ufies.org> GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E Ce que l'on conçoit bien s'énonce clairement, Et les mots pour le dire arrivent aisément. Nicolas Boileau, L'Art poétique Attachment:
pgpLfMO0nylRD.pgp
|
|