|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Thu, 2002-07-04 at 11:09, Leonard Rosenthol wrote:
> At 11:12 PM -0400 7/3/02, Noah Silva wrote:
> >Very little for C++ (it's just broken! use Objective C!),
>
> Don't get me started on Objective C - it's just WAY TOO WEIRD
> and needs to be updated to the 1990's (let alone 2000)...
As I understand it, apple is working on this now, as they are sing it
for the development of OS X stuff. C++ was designed to be a temporary
solution, and imo, it shows.
> > and Java I would like if it could compile Java language
> >to Binary native code.
>
> You can - there are companies that offer Java native compilers.
I am aware of this, but it's here and there. I would actually be more
interested in a compiler to take pascal and/or C into Java ByteCode.
> >Note that java stole a LOT from object pascal.
>
> And why not....
Oh I didn't say it was a bad thing.
-- noah silva
______________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|