| gabriel rosenkoetter on Sun, 14 Jul 2002 23:08:19 -0400 |
|
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 10:45:48AM -0400, Bill Jonas wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 04:48:50PM -0400, gabriel rosenkoetter wrote: > > Oh no, say it ain't so. They're going to gcc 3.2? > Apparently. On the upside, I hear that it has the best C++ support yet. At the expense of vaguely three times the compile time. (It's *barely* optimized for speed on IA32, and don't get me started on other architectures... like say, PowerPC, where it simply doesn't work.) > Apparently not with RH 7.0. <smirk> gcc 2.96, gcc/kgcc, etc... s,\.0,.x, apparently. -- gabriel rosenkoetter gr@eclipsed.net Attachment:
pgpq2jPu3fTcK.pgp
|
|