gabriel rosenkoetter on Mon, 26 Aug 2002 22:20:08 +0200 |
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:44:07PM -0400, Bill Jonas wrote: > Actually, it looks just fine to me. Yes, I get momentarily confused > sometimes (typing "route -n show" in Linux when I really just need > "route -n", for example), but that particular line looks good enough to > satisfy both BSD's and Linux's idea of route(8). No, NetBSD's route(8) wouldn't know what to do with the gw in what I posted earlier. It's a syntax error there. -- gabriel rosenkoetter gr@eclipsed.net Attachment:
pgpOy5b2ILS64.pgp
|
|