Iman Mayes on Fri, 11 Oct 2002 22:30:05 -0400


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PLUG] PLUG Website Maintenence


Thanks for the anybrowser.org link. It looks like something that will come
in handy!

Iman Mayes

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason" <jason@nocks.com>
To: <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 4:27 PM
Subject: Re: [PLUG] PLUG Website Maintenence


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thursday 10 October 2002 10H:21, gabriel rosenkoetter wrote:
> <lengthy snippage>
>
> Oh, what a long, strange thread it's been... Just caught up with it
earlier
> today. I'll try to toss in my $.02 without heating things up further.
>
> I tend to agree with most of gabriel's points in this thread. And, I do
use
> graphical web-browsers most of the time. Generally, Konqueror or Mozilla.
> I've had to use IE and Netscape many times in the past as well. However,
> there are occasions where I'm working remotely and still want to browse
the
> web just for a piece of information, and I do rely on text-only utilities
> like Lynx. So, it may not be the tool I use all of the time, but I hate
> running into sites that were not designed with accessibility in mind when
I
> do use it.
>
> Also, I have a PDA that very few other people have (Rex 6000) that is
supposed
> to sync w/ the web. If I get that feature working, it will likely be with
> help from other open source developers and will be largely text-based. The
> Plug website would certainly be one of the websites of interest to me if I
> did get this working.
>
> A couple of points here:
> 1) Very glad to see some interest in working on the website. I hope the
> lengthy discussion doesn't spoil your enthusiasm.
>
> 2) I have not seen a reference to the "Viewable with Any Browser"
campaign.
> Check it out at:
> http://www.anybrowser.org/campaign/
> If someone else already mentioned it, sorry for the repost.
>
> I believe this campaign has been going on for at least 6-7 years, and is
still
> quite important, particularly in the light of this thread. The main point
is
> that web pages should be designed with accessibility in mind, not
targeting
> specific browsers. We are trying to get away from the days when you needed
to
> be running one or two specific applications to get access to the
information
> you are seeking out. The GNU/Linux/BSD community is generally particularly
> sensitive to this point.
>
> 3) I have seen a "what's wrong with browser detects" type of question
posted.
> 1st, go check out the "Viewable with Any Browser" campaign mentioned
above.
> This question is addressed in detail.  2nd, what would be the definitive
list
> of browsers? Would you include utilities like LWP, web-archiving
utilities,
> etc.?
>
> What about tools that haven't been created yet? What if I worked on a new
> utility tomorrow (see my PDA above)? If I did so, I'd try to stick to the
W3C
> standards as much as possible. Shouldn't the pages do the same? It's
almost
> impossible to try to put together a list and target every possible
different
> type and version of browser individually. You end up falling back to
needing
> at least one version that works for _most browsers_ that *can't be
> anticipated*.
>
> The work spent tailoring a page or entire site to look at its best with
just a
> couple of browsers' extensions is largely wasted effort. If that is what's
> desired, you are better off creating a PDF document. You can create a much
> more controlled look-and-feel, layout, etc. Instead, just make the version
> that works for _most browsers_ the *only version* and make it work for
_all
> browsers_. That doesn't mean it can't have a clean, well-organized, and
> attractive design. As others have said, HTML is intended to allow
designing
> pages for a broad range of platforms, and standard-compliant HTML should
> degrade gracefully. Most newer standards-compliant look-and-feel
development
> is done with CSS. Again, limit this where it's not really necessary.
>
> The content comes first. Then comes organizing the content. The last, but
> still important point, is attractive look and feel. Just don't make the
last
> priority get in the way of the first two.
>
> 4) Also, there was a previous post from "multiple seriousity" that offered
a
> number of good points to keep in mind for web design. There were some good
> points in there, some of which haven't been mentioned recently. In
> particular, I think it's important to try to establish URLs over time
(finer
> granularity than just phillylinux.org) that remain around while the
content
> may change.
>
> For example, http://www.PhillyLinux.org/meetings.html should probably
always
> be a valid URL that will bring up the current list of meetings, etc. That
> doesn't mean you need to preserve the old design of that page after a
> redesign, but rather all reasonable efforts should be made to make sure
that
> the URL is always valid and current.
>
> 5) Size and speed of graphics has been implied. Again, accessibility is
> important. Not everyone has DSL/cable modems/satellite/etc. Not everyone
has
> a T-1 in their basement. Graphics should not be large. The site should
load
> quickly, even over slower connections. Graphics should not get in the way
of
> getting at the content. That doesn't mean they can't exist, just don't go
> overboard with them.
>
> Cheers,
> Jason Nocks
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQE9pzQo3CryLfCgqRkRAvPuAJ4yikHUEYIvAHMwAbPX2d91S3vZjwCfbmDS
> W8ZDLRHXWTR+kxGKXtLVScY=
> =+ev+
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Philadelphia Linux Users Group        --       http://www.phillylinux.org
> Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
> General Discussion  --   http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group        --       http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug