Mike Leone on Fri, 18 Oct 2002 18:15:11 -0400 |
Fred K Ollinger (follinge@sas.upenn.edu) wrote this on 10 18, 02 at 15:06: > > FOR: > > - cheaper operating costs > > - stability and uptime > > - no single vendor lock-in > > Fun. Meaningless, in a business environment. :-) > Flexible. > Longer history. Unix, yes. Not Linux. And yes, some people do see them as different. > Consistency. > Configurability. > Univeral compatability. With? > Privacy. > Piracy fears (BSA). > Ease of use. *nix is seen as extremely hard to use; all those arcane command line options to remember. > More software by default. > Quicker patch releases. > Teaches overall computer knowledge rather than memorizing a series of > buttons that will change in the next release. See point one, above. :-) > VB support. *nix has VB support? > > > > AGAINST: > > - user retraining > > - MS Office compatibility > > - unfamiliarity - FUD > > Scares people away. > Percieved lack of support. > Games. > Better animations when booting (I'm not kidding, this is important.) > Household brandname. > Consistency. > Cost--many departments pride themselves on how BIG their budgets are. > Well-known software. > Job security. > Ease of learning. > More software you can buy. > Obscurity from hacking (no source). > Schools are cranking out people who have all the buttons memorized for the > current release. > VB support. Nice list. -- PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF Member, LEAF Project <http://leaf.sourceforge.net> AIM: MikeLeone Public Key - <http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.asc> Registered Linux user# 201348 Attachment:
pgpMZiJpJsHR7.pgp
|
|