Marc Zucchelli on Fri, 13 Dec 2002 14:00:06 -0500 |
> you really shouldn't backup > from a live > file system (rather, it should be mounted read > only). This makes sense, right now I can do that since it's just a fileserver that people use 9-5, but I have a feeling we'll be setting up another server sometime soon used to host websites. Obviously it is not a good idea to remount a partition that has live websites on it to read-only, even at odd hours of the night. In this case, is it still a bad idea to run backups on the live, writable filesystem? Other than that...I just simulated the problem by taring a list of files, and making one of them not readable to the user that was taring it, I found that all the messages I need go right to stderr, this should be a good start for me, thanks everyone. Marc __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|