gabriel rosenkoetter on Thu, 30 Jan 2003 07:50:29 -0500


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PLUG] firewall risk


On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 06:50:46AM -0500, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
> That is, suppose I make the naive argument that I only run sshd on
> port 22, so all other ports get denied anyway by dint of having
> nothing listening (not even inetd). Why bother with ip tables beyond
> masquerading?
> 
> (I'm pretty sure this is wrong, I just don't know why.)

Because, historically, the Linux kernel has a bad track record of
errors leading to DoS or even remote accessibitity in the TCP/IP
stack.

(So, btw, does the 4.2 BSD kernel's IP code, which is one reason
that WinNT had long-term problems, having used 4.2 BSD's IP source
and not merged in later fixes by more recent operating systems.)

-- 
gabriel rosenkoetter
gr@eclipsed.net

Attachment: pgpbOFFERO5sx.pgp
Description: PGP signature